On some conservative blogs, I notice that some complain about women wearing pants.
Firstly, pants originally meant (underwear) now women wearing underwear, you'd think that a conservative would highly approve of women NOT going commando.
Assuming that by pants they ( those opposed to women wearing them) mean slacks then my question changes to:
What's wrong with women wearing slacks?
I live in my slacks, jeans, etc. I am a SAHM mother, and I don't vacuum or clean house, or play on the floor with Frodo in my cashmere sweater set, A-line skirt with crinoline, high heels and pearls ( I'm trying to allude to June Cleaver) when I do.
So exactly what's the beef with slacks and jeans for women?
I, gasp, have even worn slacks, nicely pressed, and clean, to mass on Sundays. I don't see the problem.
They cover my legs, more and better than a skirt or dress. If Frodo is on my lap and starts acting up, he can't cause my lap be become uncovered, as he has done when I am wearing a dress or skirt. So really what's the big deal?
Scripture to keep in mind
Six things there are, which the Lord hateth, and the seventh his soul detesteth:  Haughty eyes, a lying tongue, hands that shed innocent blood,  A heart that deviseth wicked plots, feet that are swift to run into mischief, A deceitful witness that uttereth lies, and him that soweth discord among brethren.  My son, keep the commandments of thy father, and forsake not the law of thy mother. ***Cf:Douay-Rheims Proverbs 6: 16-20
I declare that I have no intent to acknowledge, distribute or encourage anything contrary to Sacred Scripture, Sacred Tradition and the teachings of the Roman Catholic Church and the Apostolic See. I submit myself and all the contents of this blog to the judgment of the Church.